Nosso grupo organiza mais de 3.000 Séries de conferências Eventos todos os anos nos EUA, Europa e outros países. Ásia com o apoio de mais 1.000 Sociedades e publica mais de 700 Acesso aberto Periódicos que contém mais de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, cientistas de renome como membros do conselho editorial.
Periódicos de acesso aberto ganhando mais leitores e citações
700 periódicos e 15 milhões de leitores Cada periódico está obtendo mais de 25.000 leitores
Adams K, Hansmann A, Bosanac D, Peddu P, Ryan S and Papagrigoriadis S
Objective: As colorectal anastomotic leaks (AL) often present with non-specific clinical features, Computed Tomography (CT) scans are commonly used to aid in diagnosis. Aim was to define radiologist reported features in CT scans following colorectal resection as diagnostic factors for clinical AL detection.
Methods: Consecutive patients identified with a clinically confirmed post-operative AL. Control group (matched 2:1 ratio) selected from patients who were scanned with a clinical suspicion of an AL, though eventually disproved and who did not require re-operation. Four gastrointestinal radiologists reviewed CT scans, blinded to clinical outcome. Radiologists assessed for the overall impression of a radiological AL and presence of the adjunct leak features. A leak prediction model was constructed with multivariate logistic regression with outcome classified as clinical AL.
Results: 18 patients with confirmed AL, 36 matched control patients. No significant difference in the sensitivity/specificity between the radiologists in accuracy of leak detection, with overall correct diagnosis of clinical AL 81.4%. Radiological Leak, abnormal bowel wall appearance and ileus were significant predictors (P<0.05) within regression model. The prediction model produced an overall sensitivity 85.2%, specificity 80.2% and ROC curve area of 87.3%.
Conclusion: Individual radiologist reported CT features have been used to create a risk prediction model that improves diagnostic accuracy of AL over general radiological impression alone.