ISSN: 1522-4821

Jornal Internacional de Saúde Mental de Emergência e Resiliência Humana

Acesso livre

Nosso grupo organiza mais de 3.000 Séries de conferências Eventos todos os anos nos EUA, Europa e outros países. Ásia com o apoio de mais 1.000 Sociedades e publica mais de 700 Acesso aberto Periódicos que contém mais de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, cientistas de renome como membros do conselho editorial.

Periódicos de acesso aberto ganhando mais leitores e citações
700 periódicos e 15 milhões de leitores Cada periódico está obtendo mais de 25.000 leitores

Abstrato

Does The Timetable Of Public Assistance Payments Affect Visits At The Psychiatric Emergency Room?

Adam Noy MD, Daniel Moadel MD

Introduction: Many psychiatric patients in urban areas of the US receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI). It is conceivable that depletion of funds triggers for some patients a visit to emergency room (ER). If this was the case, it could be expected to register an increase numbers of visits of SSI recipients towards the end of the payment cycle. If this is not the case, the suspicion that admission to the hospital might also provide a secondary gain, should be remove as a consideration, so that patients can receive an unbiased assessment. Methods: Charts of patient’s visits at the psychiatric ER of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia were reviewed. The relationship between the number of days after receiving the benefits payment and time of presentation to the ER was analyzed. Homelessness status and the presence of a positive drug test were also considered. Results: 274/1007 of patients who visited the ER visits during 2018 were recipients of SSI. No relationship was found between visit time and days elapsed since last benefits check. The interval between receiving benefits and visiting the ER had no relationship to homelessness status (p=0.9271) or the presence of a positive drug screen (p=0.0752) Conclusion: There was no increase in ER visits at the end of the payment cycle to suggest that exhausted funds played a role, either as a psychosocial stressor or as a motivation for the secondary gain. Despite the limitations of this study, denying admission to a patient based on suspicions of secondary gains should be reconsider