ISSN: 2278-0238

Revista Internacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Farmácia e Ciências da Vida

Acesso livre

Nosso grupo organiza mais de 3.000 Séries de conferências Eventos todos os anos nos EUA, Europa e outros países. Ásia com o apoio de mais 1.000 Sociedades e publica mais de 700 Acesso aberto Periódicos que contém mais de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, cientistas de renome como membros do conselho editorial.

Periódicos de acesso aberto ganhando mais leitores e citações
700 periódicos e 15 milhões de leitores Cada periódico está obtendo mais de 25.000 leitores

Abstrato

SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF DROTAVERINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PARACETAMOL IN BULK AND TABLET DOSAGE FORM BY RP-HPLC METHOD

S. P. Mahaparale and S. S. Patil

A simple, rapid, reproducible, accurate and precise Reverse Phase HPLC method was developed for the quantitative simultaneous estimation of Drotaverine hydrochloride and Paracetamol in combined tablet dosage form. Drotaverine hydrochloride is an analog of papaver and is used mainly as an antispasmodic, smooth muscle relaxant. Paracetamol has analgesic and antipyretic activity. The chromatographic separation of both drugs was achieved with 250 x 4.6 mm, i.d 5 μm C-18 column using Methanol: water pH adjusted to 4.0 with O- Phosphoric acid. (60:40 v/v) at the flow rate of 1ml/min. The measurements were made at 243.0 nm using UV detector. The linearity range was found to be 5-80 μg/ml for Drotaverine hydrochloride and 5-70 μg/ml for Paracetamol. The coefficient of correlation for Drotaverine hydrochloride and Paracetamol was found to be 0.9994 and 0.9990 respectively. The retention time for Drotaverine hydrochloride and Paracetamol were 4.562 min and 8.146 min, respectively. The tailing factor for Drotaverine hydrochloride and Paracetamol was found to be 1.12 and 1.18 respectively. The percent recoveries obtained for Drotaverine hydrochloride and Paracetamol were found to be 99.85 and 99.92 respectively. The relative standard deviation for intraday and interday precision in tablet was always less than 2%. The method was validated for linearity, range, precision, accuracy, specificity, selectivity, intermediate precision, ruggedness, robustness, stability and suitability.