ISSN: 2161-0460

Jornal da doença de Alzheimer e parkinsonismo

Acesso livre

Nosso grupo organiza mais de 3.000 Séries de conferências Eventos todos os anos nos EUA, Europa e outros países. Ásia com o apoio de mais 1.000 Sociedades e publica mais de 700 Acesso aberto Periódicos que contém mais de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, cientistas de renome como membros do conselho editorial.

Periódicos de acesso aberto ganhando mais leitores e citações
700 periódicos e 15 milhões de leitores Cada periódico está obtendo mais de 25.000 leitores

Indexado em
  • Índice Copérnico
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeu
  • Abra o portão J
  • Genâmica JournalSeek
  • Chaves Acadêmicas
  • JornalTOCs
  • Infraestrutura Nacional de Conhecimento da China (CNKI)
  • Biblioteca de Periódicos Eletrônicos
  • RefSeek
  • Universidade Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC – WorldCat
  • Catálogo online SWB
  • Biblioteca Virtual de Biologia (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • Fundação de Genebra para Educação e Pesquisa Médica
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Compartilhe esta página

Abstrato

The Effectiveness of Motor Imagery on Motor Performance in Individuals with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review

Shannon Schoellig, Emily Forsyth, Alexis Parker, Christine Mortimer, Emma O’Neill

Background: Research has shown that Motor Imagery (MI) can effectively improve symptoms related to neurological conditions such as Parkinson's Disease (PD). PD is a neurodegenerative, progressive condition with no known cause or cure. As PD progresses, individuals affected may have distinct PD symptoms that negatively impact motor performance, including tremors, stiffness, bradykinesia, gait, and balance issues. MI is a cognitive process in which an individual visualizes they are performing an action or movement without carrying out the physical activity. This systematic review aims to analyze the effectiveness of using MI as an intervention on motor performance in individuals with PD.

Methods: A search string of "parkinson’s disease” OR “parkinson disease” AND “motor imagery” with modifiers of peer review, 2016-2022, and the English language was run across four databases. This returned 277 results that were further screened with inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality of evidence measures, leaving four articles for analysis. To evaluate the risk of bias, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) tool was used. Articles were analyzed and coded by sample size, intervention, results, and the overall impact of MI on PD. This systematic review was registered through PROSPERO.

Results: MI was found to have positive outcomes in improving participants’ general motor functions.

Conclusion: Evidence supports using MI as an intervention to improve motor performance for individuals with PD and other neurodegenerative conditions. Further research would provide parameters on how to incorporate MI as an intervention.